linux-kernel - Re: [patch] epoll: remove unneeded variable in reverse_path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:53:24 -0500
From:	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
To:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [patch] epoll: remove unneeded variable in reverse_path_check()

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 02:31:58PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> We never use the length variable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> 
> diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
> index c636fc8..997a6d2 100644
> --- a/fs/eventpoll.c
> +++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
> @@ -1042,13 +1042,11 @@ static int reverse_path_check_proc(void *priv, void *cookie, int call_nests)
>   */
>  static int reverse_path_check(void)
>  {
> -	int length = 0;
>  	int error = 0;
>  	struct file *current_file;
>  
>  	/* let's call this for all tfiles */
>  	list_for_each_entry(current_file, &tfile_check_list, f_tfile_llink) {
> -		length++;
>  		path_count_init();
>  		error = ep_call_nested(&poll_loop_ncalls, EP_MAX_NESTS,
>  					reverse_path_check_proc, current_file,

Yes, I had that in there while testing, and should have removed it.

Acked-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>

Thanks,

-Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/