[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHQjnOPE5X=dn+8D348OruLqoYNGZwZk3eLtLRSERce-eTzXDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 01:08:36 +0900
From: KyongHo Cho <pullip.cho@...sung.com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Subash Patel <subash.ramaswamy@...aro.org>,
Younglak Kim <younglak1004.kim@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Sanghyun Lee <sanghyun75.lee@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/2] ommu/exynos: Add IOMMU/System MMU driver for
Samsung Exynos
Hi Marek.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Marek Szyprowski
<m.szyprowski@...sung.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday, December 29, 2011 1:24 PM KyongHo Cho wrote:
>
>> Changes since v7:
>> - Rebased with the recent commits of the following git branches
>> * git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/joro/iommu.git/next
>> * git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git/for-next
>> - Changed magic numbers into macros
>> - Setting owner of a System MMU in 'iommu' field of dev_archdata
>> - Verbose message in the default fault handler
>> - Some bug fixes.
>
> (snipped)
>
> The time is flying away and v3.4 merge windows will open soon. Do you plan to
> send an updated version of the SYSMMU driver anytime soon? It will be really
> nice to have it finally merged to v3.4.
>
Thank you for asking.
I prepared a new patchset and it is ready for submitting.
It includes several bugfixes and Exynos5 support.
The last patche submitted has a bug when the following situation:
1. Allocating a 2nd level page table to map 4KB or 64KB on a virtual region
2. Unmapped all entries in the 2nd level page table.
3. Mapping to the same region with 1MB page.
Then iommu_map() will return -EADDRINUSE due to incorrect counting
free entries in 2nd level page table.
The next patch will be submitted by 2/28.
BTW Marek, I want to know why MFC driver defines separate platform devices
for left and right buses.
The next IOMMU driver defines just one platform device for a H/W device.
Thus, it defines just one SYSMMU_MFC platform device, for example.
(the previous one defines 2 platform devices for SYSMMU_MFC)
However, it is easy to separate the single platform device to multiple
platform devices.
Regards,
Cho KyongHo.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists