[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120224114748.720ee79a.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 11:47:48 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Enable MAP_UNINITIALIZED for archs with mmu
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:42:16 -0800
Arun Sharma <asharma@...com> wrote:
> Hi Balbir,
>
> Thanks for reviewing. Would you change your position if I limit the
> scope of the patch to a cgroup with a single address space?
>
> The moment the cgroup sees more than one address space (either due to
> tasks getting created or being added), this optimization would be turned
> off.
>
> More details below:
>
> On 2/22/12 11:45 PM, Balbir Singh wrote:
> >
> > So the assumption is that only apps that have access to each others
> > VMA's will run in this cgroup?
> >
>
> In a distributed computing environment, a user submits a job to the
> cluster job scheduler. The job might involve multiple related
> executables and might involve multiple address spaces. But they're
> performing one logical task, have a single resource limit enforced by a
> cgroup.
>
> They don't have access to each other's VMAs, but if "accidentally" one
> of them comes across an uninitialized page with data from another task,
> it's not a violation of the security model.
>
How do you handle shared resouce, file-cache ?
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists