[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F47E0D0.9030409@fb.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 11:11:12 -0800
From: Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>
To: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Enable MAP_UNINITIALIZED for archs with mmu
On 2/24/12 6:51 AM, Balbir Singh wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:17 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
> <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>> They don't have access to each other's VMAs, but if "accidentally" one
>>> of them comes across an uninitialized page with data from another task,
>>> it's not a violation of the security model.
>
> Can you expand more on the single address space model?
I haven't thought this through yet. But I know that just adding
&& (cgroup_task_count() == 1)
to page_needs_clearing() is not going to do it. We'll have to design a
new mechanism (cgroup_mm_count_all()?) and make sure that it doesn't
race with fork() and inadvertently expose pages from the new address
space to the existing one.
A uid based approach such as the one implemented by Davide Libenzi
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/548928
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/548926
would probably apply the optimization to more use cases - but
conceptually a bit more complex. If we go with this more relaxed
approach, we'll have to design a race-free cgroup_uid_count() based
mechanism.
-Arun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists