[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120224191535.GA4505@polaris.bitmath.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 20:15:35 +0100
From: "Henrik Rydberg" <rydberg@...omail.se>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@...csson.com>,
Jidong Xiao <jidong.xiao@...il.com>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Can we move device drivers into user-space?
> > Given the choice, I would be quite happy to piss off some robots. Call
> > it a prejudice if you like ;).
>
> You can't control how people use an interface. You will note that there
> are no stupid users of the UIO interface in the kernel today, we can't
> control what people do in the privacy of their own companies/homes,
> despite numerous governments trying to do so in the past.
>
> So yes, people will always do stupid, foolish things. And they were
> doing them before UIO came along, now they just have the chance to at
> least do those foolish things in a way that interfaces with the kernel
> in a semi-sane manner, not messing anything else in the kernel up.
So the question is; can the uio example be repeated in other areas, to
bring more kernel power to userspace?
No doubt, the kernel has fostered an unprecedented code-quality view,
which, IMHO, is the bottom line. As long as that quality remains
unchallenged, having all drivers in-kernel will remain the best
choice. But, suppose some entity managed to keep that quality in
userspace, would there be any reason to think of it as a bad idea? I
think not.
Henrik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists