[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF17BD8BCD8C@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 13:35:08 -0800
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
To: "Mark Brown (broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com)"
<broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
"Liam Girdwood (lrg@...com)" <lrg@...com>,
Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>
CC: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: sdmmc controllers without vmmc regulator
sdhci_add_host() calls regulator_get(..., "vmmc"), which under device-
tree calls of_get_regulator(), which contains:
regnode = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, prop_name, 0);
if (!regnode) {
dev_warn(dev, "%s property in node %s references invalid phandle",
prop_name, dev->of_node->full_name);
return NULL;
}
Thus if the vmmc-supply property is missing, because a board has no
regulator for a particular SD controller (power is always on), then
the warning is printed.
Can we eliminate this warning in of_get_regulator(), and let clients
Control whether they warn when a regulator isn't found, if they think
one is mandatory? I think I'd prefer this option; it's consistent with
the non-DT path in regulator_dev_lookup().
Or, should I set up dummy regulators in device tree to cover this case,
such that an SD controller's vmmc-supply always points at a valid phandle.
In which case, I'd have to add DT support to the dummy regulator.
Thanks.
--
nvpublic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists