linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] msm: timer: Support sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:10:00 -0800
From:	David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
To:	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] msm: timer: Support sched_clock()

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 05:37:57PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > This patch relies on the fact that the HAVE_SCHED_CLOCK config option no
> > longer exists. We could push it in if the patch had that option added to
> > the Kconfig, but then it would conflict with the removal of the Kconfig
> > by 6905a65 (ARM: Make the sched_clock framework mandatory, 2012-01-18).
> 
> Ah! Indeed, you're perfectly right.
> 
> > So I guess we send it through the arm-soc tree?
> 
> I don't think arm-soc tracks rmk/for-next, so this has to go via
> Russell's tree. I'll take the patch and send Russell another pull
> request then.

Thanks, Marc.

David

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/