linux-kernel - Re: Can we move device drivers into user-space?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120225205540.GA29303@kroah.com>
Date:	Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:55:40 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Jidong Xiao <jidong.xiao@...il.com>
Cc:	Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Can we move device drivers into user-space?

On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 02:23:07PM -0500, Jidong Xiao wrote:
> Hi, Greg,
> 
> These two studies support my point. If the first one is too old, then
> the second one should be more convincing. To save your time, you can
> take a look at their conclusion first.
> 
> An Empirical Study of Operating Systems Errors
> http://www.stanford.edu/~engler/metrics-sosp-01.pdf
> 
> Faults in Linux: Ten Years Later
> http://pagesperso-systeme.lip6.fr/Suman.Saha/src/asplos11.pdf

This second paper proves my point, it's funny that you tried to use it
to prove yours, you obviously must not have read the conclusion...

Anyway, any paper that goes "look at all of these problems in the code!"
and isn't instantly followed by patches fixing ALL of those problems by
the authors of the paper, should be ignored as a troll masquerading as a
"study".

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/