[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120225035128.GA4455@pengutronix.de>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 04:51:28 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kevin.wells@....com, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] USB: Support for LPC32xx SoC
> I would recomment telling this from the device itself rather than from the
> platform.
Basically yes...
> Unfortunately, the way that ohci handles the abstraction between the
> various implementations is backwards, it would be much easier if the
> main driver was following that model to start with.
... exactly for that reason I didn't suggest it. Looking at other ohci-sources
(e.g. ohci-omap.c), machine_is_* seems to be the consistent use-case.
Thanks,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists