lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F487215.7000307@openvz.org>
Date:	Sat, 25 Feb 2012 09:31:01 +0400
From:	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
To:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
CC:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] mm: lru_lock splitting

KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:51:36 +0400
> Konstantin Khlebnikov<khlebnikov@...nvz.org>  wrote:
>
>> v3 changes:
>> * inactive-ratio reworked again, now it always calculated from from scratch
>> * hierarchical pte reference bits filter in memory-cgroup reclaimer
>> * fixed two bugs in locking, found by Hugh Dickins
>> * locking functions slightly simplified
>> * new patch for isolated pages accounting
>> * new patch with lru interleaving
>>
>> This patchset is based on next-20120210
>>
>> git: https://github.com/koct9i/linux/commits/lruvec-v3
>>
>
> I wonder.... I just wonder...if we can split a lruvec in a zone into small
> pieces of lruvec and have splitted LRU-lock per them, do we need per-memcg-lrulock ?

What per-memcg-lrulock? I don't have it.
last patch splits lruvecs in memcg with the same factor.

>
> It seems per-memcg-lrulock can be much bigger lock than small-lruvec-lock.
> (depends on configuraton) and much more complicated..and have to take care
> of many things.. If unit of splitting can be specified by boot option,
> it seems admins can split a big memcg's per-memcg-lru lock into more small pieces.

lruvec count per memcg can be arbitrary and changeable if cgroup is empty.
This is not in this patch, but it's really easy.

>
> BTW, how to think of default size of splitting ? I wonder splitting lru into
> the number of cpus per a node can be a choice. Each cpu may have a chance to
> set prefered-pfn-range at page allocation with additional patches.

If we rework page to memcg linking and add direct lruvec-id into page->flags,
we will able to change lruvec before inserting page to lru.
Thus each cpu will always insert pages into its own lruvec in zone.
I have not thought about races yet, but this would be perfect solution.

>
> Thanks,
> -Kame
>
>
>> ---
>>
>> Konstantin Khlebnikov (21):
>>        memcg: unify inactive_ratio calculation
>>        memcg: make mm_match_cgroup() hirarchical
>>        memcg: fix page_referencies cgroup filter on global reclaim
>>        memcg: use vm_swappiness from target memory cgroup
>>        mm: rename lruvec->lists into lruvec->pages_lru
>>        mm: lruvec linking functions
>>        mm: add lruvec->pages_count
>>        mm: unify inactive_list_is_low()
>>        mm: add lruvec->reclaim_stat
>>        mm: kill struct mem_cgroup_zone
>>        mm: move page-to-lruvec translation upper
>>        mm: push lruvec into update_page_reclaim_stat()
>>        mm: push lruvecs from pagevec_lru_move_fn() to iterator
>>        mm: introduce lruvec locking primitives
>>        mm: handle lruvec relocks on lumpy reclaim
>>        mm: handle lruvec relocks in compaction
>>        mm: handle lruvec relock in memory controller
>>        mm: add to lruvec isolated pages counters
>>        memcg: check lru vectors emptiness in pre-destroy
>>        mm: split zone->lru_lock
>>        mm: zone lru vectors interleaving
>>
>>
>>   include/linux/huge_mm.h    |    3
>>   include/linux/memcontrol.h |   75 ------
>>   include/linux/mm.h         |   66 +++++
>>   include/linux/mm_inline.h  |   19 +-
>>   include/linux/mmzone.h     |   39 ++-
>>   include/linux/swap.h       |    6
>>   mm/Kconfig                 |   16 +
>>   mm/compaction.c            |   31 +--
>>   mm/huge_memory.c           |   14 +
>>   mm/internal.h              |  204 +++++++++++++++++
>>   mm/ksm.c                   |    2
>>   mm/memcontrol.c            |  343 +++++++++++-----------------
>>   mm/migrate.c               |    2
>>   mm/page_alloc.c            |   70 +-----
>>   mm/rmap.c                  |    2
>>   mm/swap.c                  |  217 ++++++++++--------
>>   mm/vmscan.c                |  534 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>>   mm/vmstat.c                |    6
>>   18 files changed, 932 insertions(+), 717 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> Signature
>>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ