[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F487215.7000307@openvz.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 09:31:01 +0400
From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] mm: lru_lock splitting
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:51:36 +0400
> Konstantin Khlebnikov<khlebnikov@...nvz.org> wrote:
>
>> v3 changes:
>> * inactive-ratio reworked again, now it always calculated from from scratch
>> * hierarchical pte reference bits filter in memory-cgroup reclaimer
>> * fixed two bugs in locking, found by Hugh Dickins
>> * locking functions slightly simplified
>> * new patch for isolated pages accounting
>> * new patch with lru interleaving
>>
>> This patchset is based on next-20120210
>>
>> git: https://github.com/koct9i/linux/commits/lruvec-v3
>>
>
> I wonder.... I just wonder...if we can split a lruvec in a zone into small
> pieces of lruvec and have splitted LRU-lock per them, do we need per-memcg-lrulock ?
What per-memcg-lrulock? I don't have it.
last patch splits lruvecs in memcg with the same factor.
>
> It seems per-memcg-lrulock can be much bigger lock than small-lruvec-lock.
> (depends on configuraton) and much more complicated..and have to take care
> of many things.. If unit of splitting can be specified by boot option,
> it seems admins can split a big memcg's per-memcg-lru lock into more small pieces.
lruvec count per memcg can be arbitrary and changeable if cgroup is empty.
This is not in this patch, but it's really easy.
>
> BTW, how to think of default size of splitting ? I wonder splitting lru into
> the number of cpus per a node can be a choice. Each cpu may have a chance to
> set prefered-pfn-range at page allocation with additional patches.
If we rework page to memcg linking and add direct lruvec-id into page->flags,
we will able to change lruvec before inserting page to lru.
Thus each cpu will always insert pages into its own lruvec in zone.
I have not thought about races yet, but this would be perfect solution.
>
> Thanks,
> -Kame
>
>
>> ---
>>
>> Konstantin Khlebnikov (21):
>> memcg: unify inactive_ratio calculation
>> memcg: make mm_match_cgroup() hirarchical
>> memcg: fix page_referencies cgroup filter on global reclaim
>> memcg: use vm_swappiness from target memory cgroup
>> mm: rename lruvec->lists into lruvec->pages_lru
>> mm: lruvec linking functions
>> mm: add lruvec->pages_count
>> mm: unify inactive_list_is_low()
>> mm: add lruvec->reclaim_stat
>> mm: kill struct mem_cgroup_zone
>> mm: move page-to-lruvec translation upper
>> mm: push lruvec into update_page_reclaim_stat()
>> mm: push lruvecs from pagevec_lru_move_fn() to iterator
>> mm: introduce lruvec locking primitives
>> mm: handle lruvec relocks on lumpy reclaim
>> mm: handle lruvec relocks in compaction
>> mm: handle lruvec relock in memory controller
>> mm: add to lruvec isolated pages counters
>> memcg: check lru vectors emptiness in pre-destroy
>> mm: split zone->lru_lock
>> mm: zone lru vectors interleaving
>>
>>
>> include/linux/huge_mm.h | 3
>> include/linux/memcontrol.h | 75 ------
>> include/linux/mm.h | 66 +++++
>> include/linux/mm_inline.h | 19 +-
>> include/linux/mmzone.h | 39 ++-
>> include/linux/swap.h | 6
>> mm/Kconfig | 16 +
>> mm/compaction.c | 31 +--
>> mm/huge_memory.c | 14 +
>> mm/internal.h | 204 +++++++++++++++++
>> mm/ksm.c | 2
>> mm/memcontrol.c | 343 +++++++++++-----------------
>> mm/migrate.c | 2
>> mm/page_alloc.c | 70 +-----
>> mm/rmap.c | 2
>> mm/swap.c | 217 ++++++++++--------
>> mm/vmscan.c | 534 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>> mm/vmstat.c | 6
>> 18 files changed, 932 insertions(+), 717 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> Signature
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists