lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 25 Feb 2012 17:46:39 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, autofs@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] autofs4: fix compilation without CONFIG_COMPAT

On 02/25/2012 05:31 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> The compat_daemon stuff is only needed on x86-64, and is_compat_task is
>> only defined with CONFIG_COMPAT, so disable it for all other
>> configurations.
> 
> Ugh, I hate the proliferation of #ifdefs in code when they aren't
> really necessary.
> 
> How about this patch instead? It's small, simple, and clean. Maybe it
> would even allow a few other #ifdef's to be removed (I see one in
> kernel/seccomp.c, for example, although I suspect that
> 'mode1_syscalls_32' might also be a compat-only thing, so who knows)
> 
> And if you worry about the size of autofs_sb_info, I think that could
> be made denser by using 'char' or bitfields instead of the various
> ints that hold small values or flags instead.
> 

I think this patch could help clean up other places, too.

	-hpa


-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ