[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120227114040.5b0235de@notabene.brown>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:40:40 +1100
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: MD and rotational attribute
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 19:18:12 -0500 "Martin K. Petersen"
<martin.petersen@...cle.com> wrote:
> >>>>> "Neil" == NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de> writes:
>
> Neil,
>
> Neil> (I would say that the name 'rotational' is a bug - the issues here
> Neil> is really whether seek is fast or slow is it not??... but no
> Neil> matter).
>
> Both the ATA and SCSI specs use the term 'rotational' which I guess is
> how we ended up with that name.
>
>
> Neil> What do you think Martin? Should QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT move to
> Neil> queue_limits much like QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER did?
>
> Absolutely. I posted some patches converting both the nonrot and
> discard/secure discard queue flags a while back but they didn't go
> in. I'll freshen up the kit and resend...
>
Thanks!
NeilBrown
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists