linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] dmaengine: i.MX DMA series.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACKLOr0ZhN-7a=n5KvQdakbAkMXN0r53yzHQuJKfNRX3-T=22g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:20:24 +0100
From:	javier Martin <javier.martin@...ta-silicon.com>
To:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Cc:	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
	linux@....linux.org.uk, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] dmaengine: i.MX DMA series.

Hi Vinod,

On 22 February 2012 14:21, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 12:51 +0100, javier Martin wrote:
>> On 10 February 2012 15:31, Javier Martin
>> <javier.martin@...ta-silicon.com> wrote:
>> > Patches 1-3 have already been sent to the list (not merged yet)
>> > but they are submitted so that everyone can get the whole picture
>> > of what we're trying to do here.
>> >
>> > A new patch(4) has been added which adds support for multiple
>> > descriptors.
>> >
>> > [PATCH 1/4] dmaengine: Add support for MEMCPY for imx-dma.
>> > [PATCH 2/4] i.MX DMA: Add support for 2D transfers.
>> > [PATCH 3/4] dmaengine: i.MX: Add support for interleaved transfers.
>> > [PATCH 4/4] dmaengine: Add support for multiple descriptors for imx-dma.
>>
>> Hi,
>> what do you think of this series?
>>
>> Vinod: your concern about patch 1 is solved in patch 4
>> Sascha: I know you are not comfortable with patch 2 since it adds code
>> to a file which is meant to be removed. However, is there a chance you
>> accept it without me having to rewrite the whole series?
> Without 2, I think this patch set looks okay. Sascha have you tested
> this series, if so please let me know, I can apply the rest.

Please, note that if for whatever reason you don't apply patch 2 you
must not apply patch 3 either. Because, as I stated, it depends
completely on patch 2.

Regards.
-- 
Javier Martin
Vista Silicon S.L.
CDTUC - FASE C - Oficina S-345
Avda de los Castros s/n
39005- Santander. Cantabria. Spain
+34 942 25 32 60
www.vista-silicon.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/