[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120227091141.GG3401@dhcp-172-17-108-109.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:11:41 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, hughd@...gle.com, avi@...hat.com, nate@...nel.net,
cl@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dpshah@...gle.com, ctalbott@...gle.com, rni@...gle.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] mempool, percpu, blkcg: fix percpu stat allocation
and remove stats_lock
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 10:11:46PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Ok. This sounds better than embeding work_struct in blkg, I can embed it
> in request_queue and make the worker walk the list of blkg pending
> alloc of stats. Will try that. Thanks for the idea.
We might not need to make it even per-queue. Simple global list of
pending blkgs and single work item should work fine, I think.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists