| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:26:29 +0900
From: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
To: Yaniv Gardi <ygardi@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
axboe@...nel.dk, 'open list' <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mmc: card: Adding support for Sanitize in eMMC v4.5
On 02/26/2012 06:37 PM, Yaniv Gardi wrote:
>
>
> = > -----Original Message-----
> = > From: Jaehoon Chung [mailto:jh80.chung@...sung.com]
> = > Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 8:09 AM
> = > To: Yaniv Gardi
> = > Cc: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org;
> = > axboe@...nel.dk; open list
> = > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mmc: card: Adding support for Sanitize in
> = > eMMC v4.5
> = >
> = > On 02/21/2012 11:00 PM, Yaniv Gardi wrote:
> = >
> = > > Signed-off-by: Yaniv Gardi <ygardi@...eaurora.org>
> = > >
> = > > ---
> = > > drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 58
> = > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> = > > drivers/mmc/card/queue.c | 12 ++++++++-
> = > > include/linux/mmc/card.h | 7 +++++
> = > > include/linux/mmc/host.h | 1 +
> = > > 4 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> = > >
> = > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> = > > index 0c959c9..5be77e6 100644
> = > > --- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> = > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> = > > @@ -830,6 +830,9 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_discard_rq(struct
> = > mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
> = > > from = blk_rq_pos(req);
> = > > nr = blk_rq_sectors(req);
> = > >
> = > > + /* 1ST priority is DISCARD.
> = > > + 2ND is TRIM
> = > > + 3RD is ERASE */
> = > > if (mmc_can_discard(card))
> = > > arg = MMC_DISCARD_ARG;
> = > > else if (mmc_can_trim(card))
> = > > @@ -868,18 +871,11 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_secdiscard_rq(struct
> = > mmc_queue *mq,
> = > > unsigned int from, nr, arg;
> = > > int err = 0, type = MMC_BLK_SECDISCARD;
> = > >
> = > > - if (!(mmc_can_secure_erase_trim(card) ||
> = > mmc_can_sanitize(card))) {
> = > > + if (!(mmc_can_secure_erase_trim(card))) {
> = > > err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> = > > goto out;
> = > > }
> = > >
> = > > - /* The sanitize operation is supported at v4.5 only */
> = > > - if (mmc_can_sanitize(card)) {
> = > > - err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
> = > > - EXT_CSD_SANITIZE_START, 1, 0);
> = > > - goto out;
> = > > - }
> = > > -
> = > > from = blk_rq_pos(req);
> = > > nr = blk_rq_sectors(req);
> = > >
> = > > @@ -922,6 +918,44 @@ out:
> = > > return err ? 0 : 1;
> = > > }
> = > >
> = > > +int mmc_blk_issue_sanitize_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq,
> = > > + struct request *req)
> = > > +{
> = > > + struct mmc_blk_data *md = mq->data;
> = > > + struct mmc_card *card = md->queue.card;
> = > > + int err = 0;
> = > > +
> = > > + if (!(mmc_can_sanitize(card) && (mq->card->host->caps2 &
> = > MMC_CAP2_SANITIZE))) {
> = >
> = > if (!mmc_can_sanitize(card) && card->host->caps2 &
> = > MMC_CAP2_SANITIZE)?
>
> No. it should be (!(A & B)). Since (A & B) means there is a support in
> sanitize.
You're right. it's typo. my means that use "card->host->caps2" instead of "mq->card->host->caps2".
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
>
>
> = >
> = > > + pr_err("%s: SANITIZE is not supported", __func__);
> = > > + err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> = > > + goto out;
> = > > + }
> = > > +
> = > > + pr_info("%s: SANITIZE is supported", __func__);
> = > > +
> = > > + mmc_sd_card_set_sanitize_in_progress(card);
> = > > +
> = > > + pr_info("%s: issueing SANITIZE command...", __func__);
> = > > +
> = > > + err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
> = > > + EXT_CSD_SANITIZE_START, 1, 0);
> = > > +
> = > > + pr_info("%s: SANITIZE command returned...", __func__);
> = >
> = > Too many pr_info()..i think that need not the message..
>
> Printout Removed.
>
>
> = >
> = > > +
> = > > + if (err)
> = > > + pr_err("%s: mmcblk: mmc_switch() failed. err=%d\n",
> = > > + __func__, err);
> = >
> = > how about using mmcblkX instead of just mmcblk?
>
> Ok. I changed it to mmc%d
>
> = >
> = > > +
> = > > + mmc_sd_card_set_sanitize_completed(card);
> = > > +
> = > > +out:
> = > > + spin_lock_irq(&md->lock);
> = > > + __blk_end_request(req, err, blk_rq_bytes(req));
> = > > + spin_unlock_irq(&md->lock);
> = > > +
> = > > + return err ? 0 : 1;
> = > > +}
> = > > +
> = > > static int mmc_blk_issue_flush(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct
> = > request *req)
> = > > {
> = > > struct mmc_blk_data *md = mq->data;
> = > > @@ -1379,7 +1413,12 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rq(struct mmc_queue
> = > *mq, struct request *req)
> = > > goto out;
> = > > }
> = > >
> = > > - if (req && req->cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD) {
> = > > + if (req && req->cmd_flags & REQ_SANITIZE) {
> = > > + /* complete ongoing async transfer before issuing discard
> = > */
> = >
> = > Issuing Sanitize, not discard. typo.
>
> Typo fixed.
>
> = >
> = > > + if (card->host && card->host->areq)
> = > > + mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(mq, NULL);
> = > > + ret = mmc_blk_issue_sanitize_rq(mq, req);
> = > > + } else if (req && req->cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD) {
> = > > /* complete ongoing async transfer before issuing discard
> = > */
> = > > if (card->host->areq)
> = > > mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(mq, NULL);
> = > > @@ -1396,6 +1435,7 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rq(struct mmc_queue
> = > *mq, struct request *req)
> = > > ret = mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(mq, req);
> = > > }
> = > >
> = > > +
> = > > out:
> = > > if (!req)
> = > > /* release host only when there are no more requests */
> = > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
> = > > index dcad59c..6946ac1 100644
> = > > --- a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
> = > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
> = > > @@ -140,10 +140,15 @@ static void mmc_queue_setup_discard(struct
> = > request_queue *q,
> = > > /* granularity must not be greater than max. discard */
> = > > if (card->pref_erase > max_discard)
> = > > q->limits.discard_granularity = 0;
> = > > - if (mmc_can_secure_erase_trim(card) || mmc_can_sanitize(card))
> = > > + if (mmc_can_secure_erase_trim(card))
> = > > queue_flag_set_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_SECDISCARD, q);
> = > > }
> = > >
> = > > +static void mmc_queue_setup_sanitize(struct request_queue *q)
> = > > +{
> = > > + queue_flag_set_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_SANITIZE, q);
> = > > +}
> = > > +
> = > > /**
> = > > * mmc_init_queue - initialise a queue structure.
> = > > * @mq: mmc queue
> = > > @@ -181,6 +186,11 @@ int mmc_init_queue(struct mmc_queue *mq,
> = > struct mmc_card *card,
> = > > if (mmc_can_erase(card))
> = > > mmc_queue_setup_discard(mq->queue, card);
> = > >
> = > > + if ((mmc_can_sanitize(card) && (host->caps2 &
> = > MMC_CAP2_SANITIZE)))
> = > > + mmc_queue_setup_sanitize(mq->queue);
> = > > + else
> = > > + pr_info("%s - card doesn't support sanitize", __func__);
> = > > +
> = > > #ifdef CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE
> = > > if (host->max_segs == 1) {
> = > > unsigned int bouncesz;
> = > > diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/card.h b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> = > > index 9478a6b..0890e9c 100644
> = > > --- a/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> = > > +++ b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> = > > @@ -236,6 +236,9 @@ struct mmc_card {
> = > > #define MMC_POWEROFF_SHORT 2
> = > > #define MMC_POWEROFF_LONG 3
> = > >
> = > > +/* card is in sanitize progress */
> = > > +#define MMC_STATE_SANITIZE_IN_PROGRESS (1<<9)
> = > > +
> = > > unsigned int erase_size; /* erase size in sectors */
> = > > unsigned int erase_shift; /* if erase unit is
> = > power 2 */
> = > > unsigned int pref_erase; /* in sectors */
> = > > @@ -388,6 +391,10 @@ static inline void __maybe_unused
> = > remove_quirk(struct mmc_card *card, int data)
> = > > #define mmc_card_set_ddr_mode(c) ((c)->state |=
> = > MMC_STATE_HIGHSPEED_DDR)
> = > > #define mmc_card_set_uhs(c) ((c)->state |=
> = > MMC_STATE_ULTRAHIGHSPEED)
> = > > #define mmc_sd_card_set_uhs(c) ((c)->state |=
> = > MMC_STATE_ULTRAHIGHSPEED)
> = > > +#define mmc_sd_card_set_sanitize_in_progress(c) ((c)->state |= \
> = > > + MMC_STATE_SANITIZE_IN_PROGRESS)
> = > > +#define mmc_sd_card_set_sanitize_completed(c) ((c)->state &= \
> = > > + ~MMC_STATE_SANITIZE_IN_PROGRESS)
> = > > #define mmc_card_set_ext_capacity(c) ((c)->state |= MMC_CARD_SDXC)
> = > > #define mmc_card_set_removed(c) ((c)->state |= MMC_CARD_REMOVED)
> = > >
> = > > diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> = > > index 9a03d03..93210aa 100644
> = > > --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> = > > +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> = > > @@ -242,6 +242,7 @@ struct mmc_host {
> = > > #define MMC_CAP2_CACHE_CTRL (1 << 1) /* Allow cache
> = > control */
> = > > #define MMC_CAP2_POWEROFF_NOTIFY (1 << 2) /* Notify poweroff
> = > supported */
> = > > #define MMC_CAP2_NO_MULTI_READ (1 << 3) /* Multiblock reads
> = > don't work */
> = > > +#define MMC_CAP2_SANITIZE (1<<4) /* Support Sanitize
> = > */
> = > >
> = > > mmc_pm_flag_t pm_caps; /* supported pm features */
> = > > unsigned int power_notify_type;
> = >
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists