[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYxR7B_ozu7er8korgkkJBjmYYzw-TANzqZxK-ri7b4Wg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:54:22 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Chanho Min <chanho0207@...il.com>, Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Shreshtha Kumar Sahu <shreshthakumar.sahu@...ricsson.com>,
"Kim, Jong-Sung" <neidhard.kim@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clear previous interrupts after fifo is disabled
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:48:58AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> I'd much prefer to only clear those interrupts which actually need to be
>> cleared at this point. So, I'd suggest this approach instead:
>
> Thinking about this a little more, we definitely want to mask and clear
> interrupts at probe time as well:
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
On the RMK-improved patch.
Thanks,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists