[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHQjnON=Q9oR5s1geO_MWeG0aKKrNkyqbS2RAD1deH22fj5T0A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 01:04:25 +0900
From: KyongHo Cho <pullip.cho@...sung.com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Subash Patel <subash.ramaswamy@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Younglak Kim <younglak1004.kim@...sung.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Sanghyun Lee <sanghyun75.lee@...sung.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/2] ommu/exynos: Add IOMMU/System MMU driver for
Samsung Exynos
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Marek Szyprowski
<m.szyprowski@...sung.com> wrote:
>> The next patch will be submitted by 2/28.
>
> Ok, I will check it soon then.
Thank you a lot.
>> The next IOMMU driver defines just one platform device for a H/W device.
>> Thus, it defines just one SYSMMU_MFC platform device, for example.
>> (the previous one defines 2 platform devices for SYSMMU_MFC)
>
> Exynos4210 has 2 iommu controllers for MFC device - one for each memory bus.
> Each MFC bus can address 128MiB of IO address space. Do you mean that the new driver
> will merge these 2 controllers into one? This way we will lose half of address space
> for MFC device.
The situation seems somewhat different from our use of MFC. I also
heard from Jungtae Park
that it is better to define separate platform devices for the system
MMUs of MFC.
Regards,
Cho KyongHo.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists