linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:33:43 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree

Hi Andrew,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in
arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h between commits 8546c008924d ("i387: Uninline
the generic FP helpers that we expose to kernel modules") and
1361b83a13d4 ("i387: Split up <asm/i387.h> into exported and internal
interfaces") from the tip tree and commit
"percpu-remove-percpu_xxx-functions-fix" from the akpm tree.

I applied the appropriate part of the latter patch to
arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h and arch/x86/kernel/i387.c (see below).
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h
index 5caaf43..e9801b4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h
@@ -290,14 +290,14 @@ static inline int __thread_has_fpu(struct task_struct *tsk)
 static inline void __thread_clear_has_fpu(struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
 	tsk->thread.fpu.has_fpu = 0;
-	percpu_write(fpu_owner_task, NULL);
+	__this_cpu_write(fpu_owner_task, NULL);
 }
 
 /* Must be paired with a 'clts' before! */
 static inline void __thread_set_has_fpu(struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
 	tsk->thread.fpu.has_fpu = 1;
-	percpu_write(fpu_owner_task, tsk);
+	__this_cpu_write(fpu_owner_task, tsk);
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c b/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c
index 7734bcb..32c3972 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ void kernel_fpu_begin(void)
 		__thread_clear_has_fpu(me);
 		/* We do 'stts()' in kernel_fpu_end() */
 	} else {
-		percpu_write(fpu_owner_task, NULL);
+		__this_cpu_write(fpu_owner_task, NULL);
 		clts();
 	}
 }

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped