linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:01:21 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree

On 02/26/2012 09:53 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in 
> arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl between commit 
> arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl ("x32: Add x32 system calls to 
> syscall/syscall_64.tbl") from the tip tree and commit "syscalls,
> x86: add __NR_kcmp syscall" from the akpm tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) but did not know if this call should be
> marked "common".

It should be "common" (otherwise there would need to be an x32 variant
which would point to the compat version of the call, but in this case
even the i386 entry point goes straight to sys_kcmp.)

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/