[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120228010434.412979550@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:05:26 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [ 57/72] genirq: Unmask oneshot irqs when thread was not woken
3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
commit ac5637611150281f398bb7a47e3fcb69a09e7803 upstream.
When the primary handler of an interrupt which is marked IRQ_ONESHOT
returns IRQ_HANDLED or IRQ_NONE, then the interrupt thread is not
woken and the unmask logic of the interrupt line is never
invoked. This keeps the interrupt masked forever.
This was not noticed as most IRQ_ONESHOT users wake the thread
unconditionally (usually because they cannot access the underlying
device from hard interrupt context). Though this behaviour was nowhere
documented and not necessarily intentional. Some drivers can avoid the
thread wakeup in certain cases and run into the situation where the
interrupt line s kept masked.
Handle it gracefully.
Reported-and-tested-by: Lothar Wassmann <lw@...o-electronics.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/irq/chip.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
@@ -330,6 +330,24 @@ out_unlock:
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(handle_simple_irq);
+/*
+ * Called unconditionally from handle_level_irq() and only for oneshot
+ * interrupts from handle_fasteoi_irq()
+ */
+static void cond_unmask_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
+{
+ /*
+ * We need to unmask in the following cases:
+ * - Standard level irq (IRQF_ONESHOT is not set)
+ * - Oneshot irq which did not wake the thread (caused by a
+ * spurious interrupt or a primary handler handling it
+ * completely).
+ */
+ if (!irqd_irq_disabled(&desc->irq_data) &&
+ irqd_irq_masked(&desc->irq_data) && !desc->threads_oneshot)
+ unmask_irq(desc);
+}
+
/**
* handle_level_irq - Level type irq handler
* @irq: the interrupt number
@@ -362,8 +380,8 @@ handle_level_irq(unsigned int irq, struc
handle_irq_event(desc);
- if (!irqd_irq_disabled(&desc->irq_data) && !(desc->istate & IRQS_ONESHOT))
- unmask_irq(desc);
+ cond_unmask_irq(desc);
+
out_unlock:
raw_spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
}
@@ -417,6 +435,9 @@ handle_fasteoi_irq(unsigned int irq, str
preflow_handler(desc);
handle_irq_event(desc);
+ if (desc->istate & IRQS_ONESHOT)
+ cond_unmask_irq(desc);
+
out_eoi:
desc->irq_data.chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
out_unlock:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists