[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F4C1C7B.7020401@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:14:51 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: "Joshua C." <joshuacov@...glemail.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>
Subject: Re: [RESUBMIT] [PATCH] Use BIOS Keyboard variable to set Numlock
>
> Do you mind querying the state in Grub? This will mean that we'll have
> to remove the code that sets this bit from the kernel and leave it the
> in the state reported by the grub?
>
Doing anything in Grub is idiotic at best. The place to do it is in the
kernel BIOS stub code.
> If so I'm not sure about it. We check the BIOS data area as defined
> for IBM PCs (1981), so a fair amount of user should benefit from the
> change. Those non-BIOS boots can set the numlock=0 and won't be
> affected by this. I think this isa lot easier to implement than doing
> it in the BIOS bootstrap code.
Not really, and your patch really shows it. It probably could be done
in less than 20 lines, total.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists