[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120228010432.231224038@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:05:01 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [ 32/72] tcp: allow tcp_sacktag_one() to tag ranges not aligned with skbs
3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
[ Upstream commit cc9a672ee522d4805495b98680f4a3db5d0a0af9 ]
This commit allows callers of tcp_sacktag_one() to pass in sequence
ranges that do not align with skb boundaries, as tcp_shifted_skb()
needs to do in an upcoming fix in this patch series.
In fact, now tcp_sacktag_one() does not need to depend on an input skb
at all, which makes its semantics and dependencies more clear.
Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -1310,25 +1310,26 @@ static int tcp_match_skb_to_sack(struct
return in_sack;
}
-static u8 tcp_sacktag_one(const struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk,
- struct tcp_sacktag_state *state,
+/* Mark the given newly-SACKed range as such, adjusting counters and hints. */
+static u8 tcp_sacktag_one(struct sock *sk,
+ struct tcp_sacktag_state *state, u8 sacked,
+ u32 start_seq, u32 end_seq,
int dup_sack, int pcount)
{
struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
- u8 sacked = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked;
int fack_count = state->fack_count;
/* Account D-SACK for retransmitted packet. */
if (dup_sack && (sacked & TCPCB_RETRANS)) {
if (tp->undo_marker && tp->undo_retrans &&
- after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq, tp->undo_marker))
+ after(end_seq, tp->undo_marker))
tp->undo_retrans--;
if (sacked & TCPCB_SACKED_ACKED)
state->reord = min(fack_count, state->reord);
}
/* Nothing to do; acked frame is about to be dropped (was ACKed). */
- if (!after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq, tp->snd_una))
+ if (!after(end_seq, tp->snd_una))
return sacked;
if (!(sacked & TCPCB_SACKED_ACKED)) {
@@ -1347,13 +1348,13 @@ static u8 tcp_sacktag_one(const struct s
/* New sack for not retransmitted frame,
* which was in hole. It is reordering.
*/
- if (before(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq,
+ if (before(start_seq,
tcp_highest_sack_seq(tp)))
state->reord = min(fack_count,
state->reord);
/* SACK enhanced F-RTO (RFC4138; Appendix B) */
- if (!after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq, tp->frto_highmark))
+ if (!after(end_seq, tp->frto_highmark))
state->flag |= FLAG_ONLY_ORIG_SACKED;
}
@@ -1371,8 +1372,7 @@ static u8 tcp_sacktag_one(const struct s
/* Lost marker hint past SACKed? Tweak RFC3517 cnt */
if (!tcp_is_fack(tp) && (tp->lost_skb_hint != NULL) &&
- before(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq,
- TCP_SKB_CB(tp->lost_skb_hint)->seq))
+ before(start_seq, TCP_SKB_CB(tp->lost_skb_hint)->seq))
tp->lost_cnt_hint += pcount;
if (fack_count > tp->fackets_out)
@@ -1428,7 +1428,11 @@ static int tcp_shifted_skb(struct sock *
}
/* We discard results */
- tcp_sacktag_one(skb, sk, state, dup_sack, pcount);
+ tcp_sacktag_one(sk, state,
+ TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked,
+ TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq,
+ TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq,
+ dup_sack, pcount);
/* Difference in this won't matter, both ACKed by the same cumul. ACK */
TCP_SKB_CB(prev)->sacked |= (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked & TCPCB_EVER_RETRANS);
@@ -1667,10 +1671,14 @@ static struct sk_buff *tcp_sacktag_walk(
break;
if (in_sack) {
- TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked = tcp_sacktag_one(skb, sk,
- state,
- dup_sack,
- tcp_skb_pcount(skb));
+ TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked =
+ tcp_sacktag_one(sk,
+ state,
+ TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked,
+ TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq,
+ TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq,
+ dup_sack,
+ tcp_skb_pcount(skb));
if (!before(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq,
tcp_highest_sack_seq(tp)))
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists