lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120228010212.514772067@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:02:53 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: [ 50/73] i387: move TS_USEDFPU clearing out of __save_init_fpu and into callers

3.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>

commit b6c66418dcad0fcf83cd1d0a39482db37bf4fc41 upstream.

Touching TS_USEDFPU without touching CR0.TS is confusing, so don't do
it.  By moving it into the callers, we always do the TS_USEDFPU next to
the CR0.TS accesses in the source code, and it's much easier to see how
the two go hand in hand.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h |    9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h
@@ -259,7 +259,6 @@ static inline void fpu_save_init(struct
 static inline void __save_init_fpu(struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
 	fpu_save_init(&tsk->thread.fpu);
-	task_thread_info(tsk)->status &= ~TS_USEDFPU;
 }
 
 static inline int fpu_fxrstor_checking(struct fpu *fpu)
@@ -290,6 +289,7 @@ static inline void __unlazy_fpu(struct t
 {
 	if (task_thread_info(tsk)->status & TS_USEDFPU) {
 		__save_init_fpu(tsk);
+		task_thread_info(tsk)->status &= ~TS_USEDFPU;
 		stts();
 	} else
 		tsk->fpu_counter = 0;
@@ -356,9 +356,11 @@ static inline void kernel_fpu_begin(void
 
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!irq_fpu_usable());
 	preempt_disable();
-	if (me->status & TS_USEDFPU)
+	if (me->status & TS_USEDFPU) {
 		__save_init_fpu(me->task);
-	else
+		me->status &= ~TS_USEDFPU;
+		/* We do 'stts()' in kernel_fpu_end() */
+	} else
 		clts();
 }
 
@@ -449,6 +451,7 @@ static inline void save_init_fpu(struct
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!(task_thread_info(tsk)->status & TS_USEDFPU));
 	preempt_disable();
 	__save_init_fpu(tsk);
+	task_thread_info(tsk)->status &= ~TS_USEDFPU;
 	stts();
 	preempt_enable();
 }


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ