[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAErSpo4bw-V=SM+h5iP4nfv3HaAnHjwvNwu+4Oz8iyQcY_3gOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:36:48 -0700
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/18] PCI, powerpc: Register busn_res for root buses
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> index 910b9de..ae5ae5f 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> @@ -1660,6 +1660,8 @@ void __devinit pcibios_scan_phb(struct pci_controller *hose)
> bus->secondary = hose->first_busno;
> hose->bus = bus;
>
> + pci_bus_insert_busn_res(bus, hose->first_busno, hose->last_busno);
> +
> /* Get probe mode and perform scan */
> mode = PCI_PROBE_NORMAL;
> if (node && ppc_md.pci_probe_mode)
> @@ -1670,8 +1672,11 @@ void __devinit pcibios_scan_phb(struct pci_controller *hose)
> of_scan_bus(node, bus);
> }
>
> - if (mode == PCI_PROBE_NORMAL)
> + if (mode == PCI_PROBE_NORMAL) {
> + pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(bus, 255);
> hose->last_busno = bus->subordinate = pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
> + pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(bus, bus->subordinate);
> + }
There's a lot of powerpc code that does this:
bus_range = of_get_property(pcictrl, "bus-range", &len);
hose->first_busno = bus_range[0];
hose->last_busno = bus_range[1];
That *looks* like it is discovering the bus number aperture. Is it?
If it is, why are we using the largest bus number found by
pci_scan_child_bus() rather than "last_busno"?
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists