linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] consolidate WARN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120228003206.e661f926.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:32:06 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
Cc:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] consolidate WARN_...ONCE() static variables

On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:16:40 +0000 "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com> wrote:

> Oh, sorry - to carry static data the accesses to which are unlikely
> (i.e., as in the case given, fully contained in code sections inside
> conditionals which themselves use unlikely() on their primary/only
> clause - in other words, something that the compiler really could
> do on its own).

I think I just learned more about this patch than at any time since we
started discussing it.

Why add a new section, rather than using __read_mostly?

I suppose we should add and use a #define for this, like __read_mostly.
That would be a good site for documenting it ;)

And I come back to my old friend printk_once().  If I'm understanding
things correctly, we can/should make that test unlikely, then mark
__print_once as __this_new_section?  Otherwise... help!

btw, I don't think there's a significant performance benefit here - if
the kernel is ever executing WARN_ON_ONCE(), WARN_ONCE() or
printk_once() with any frequency then it is already badly broken.

Which brings us down to saving a bit of space.  And I don't think I see
how this saves space?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/