lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:12:50 +0000 From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com> To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@...aro.org> CC: Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>, "xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>, "linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>, "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>, "catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH-WIP 01/13] xen/arm: use r12 to pass the hypercall number to the hypervisor On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 21:05 +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 27 February 2012 16:27, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com> wrote: > > R12 is not accessible from the 16 bit "T1" Thumb encoding of mov > > immediate (which can only target r0..r7). > > > > Since we support only ARMv7+ there are "T2" and "T3" encodings available > > which do allow direct mov of an immediate into R12, but are 32 bit Thumb > > instructions. > > > > Should we use r7 instead to maximise instruction density for Thumb code? > > r7 is (used by gcc as) the Thumb frame pointer; I don't know if this > makes it worth avoiding in this context. I think it does. It actually sounds as if using r12 is fine here, the impact on code density should be pretty small -- there aren't really all that many call sites which involve hypercalls. By way of an example I measured an x86 kernel which should be using more hypercalls due to pv paging etc and found that 0.014% of the lines in "objdump -d" contained a call to the hypercall_page. (I know not all lines of objdump -d output are instructions but it's a reasonable approx IMHO). So I think using 3 16 bit instructions slots instead of 2 won't make much impact in practice. Thanks, Ian. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists