| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:56:42 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/21] mm: introduce lruvec locking primitives
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:52:47 +0400
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org> wrote:
> This is initial preparation for lru_lock splitting.
>
> This locking primites designed to hide splitted nature of lru_lock
> and to avoid overhead for non-splitted lru_lock in non-memcg case.
>
> * Lock via lruvec reference
>
> lock_lruvec(lruvec, flags)
> lock_lruvec_irq(lruvec)
>
> * Lock via page reference
>
> lock_page_lruvec(page, flags)
> lock_page_lruvec_irq(page)
> relock_page_lruvec(lruvec, page, flags)
> relock_page_lruvec_irq(lruvec, page)
> __relock_page_lruvec(lruvec, page) ( lruvec != NULL, page in same zone )
>
> They always returns pointer to some locked lruvec, page anyway can be
> not in lru, PageLRU() sign is stable while we hold returned lruvec lock.
> Caller must guarantee page to lruvec reference validity.
>
> * Lock via page, without stable page reference
>
> __lock_page_lruvec_irq(&lruvec, page)
>
> It returns true of lruvec succesfully locked and PageLRU is set.
> Initial lruvec can be NULL. Consequent calls must be in the same zone.
>
> * Unlock
>
> unlock_lruvec(lruvec, flags)
> unlock_lruvec_irq(lruvec)
>
> * Wait
>
> wait_lruvec_unlock(lruvec)
> Wait for lruvec unlock, caller must have stable reference to lruvec.
>
> __wait_lruvec_unlock(lruvec)
> Wait for lruvec unlock before locking other lrulock for same page,
> nothing if there only one possible lruvec per page.
> Used at page-to-lruvec reference switching to stabilize PageLRU sign.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
O.K. I like this.
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Hmm....Could you add a comment in memcg part ? (see below)
> ---
> mm/huge_memory.c | 8 +-
> mm/internal.h | 176 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/memcontrol.c | 14 ++--
> mm/swap.c | 58 ++++++------------
> mm/vmscan.c | 77 ++++++++++--------------
> 5 files changed, 237 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index 09e7069..74996b8 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -1228,13 +1228,11 @@ static int __split_huge_page_splitting(struct page *page,
> static void __split_huge_page_refcount(struct page *page)
> {
> int i;
> - struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
> struct lruvec *lruvec;
> int tail_count = 0;
>
> /* prevent PageLRU to go away from under us, and freeze lru stats */
> - spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> - lruvec = page_lruvec(page);
> + lruvec = lock_page_lruvec_irq(page);
> compound_lock(page);
> /* complete memcg works before add pages to LRU */
> mem_cgroup_split_huge_fixup(page);
> @@ -1316,11 +1314,11 @@ static void __split_huge_page_refcount(struct page *page)
> BUG_ON(atomic_read(&page->_count) <= 0);
>
> __dec_zone_page_state(page, NR_ANON_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGES);
> - __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ANON_PAGES, HPAGE_PMD_NR);
> + __mod_zone_page_state(lruvec_zone(lruvec), NR_ANON_PAGES, HPAGE_PMD_NR);
>
> ClearPageCompound(page);
> compound_unlock(page);
> - spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> + unlock_lruvec_irq(lruvec);
>
> for (i = 1; i < HPAGE_PMD_NR; i++) {
> struct page *page_tail = page + i;
> diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
> index ef49dbf..9454752 100644
> --- a/mm/internal.h
> +++ b/mm/internal.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,182 @@
>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
>
> +static inline void lock_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, unsigned long *flags)
> +{
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&lruvec_zone(lruvec)->lru_lock, *flags);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void lock_lruvec_irq(struct lruvec *lruvec)
> +{
> + spin_lock_irq(&lruvec_zone(lruvec)->lru_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void unlock_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, unsigned long *flags)
> +{
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lruvec_zone(lruvec)->lru_lock, *flags);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void unlock_lruvec_irq(struct lruvec *lruvec)
> +{
> + spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec_zone(lruvec)->lru_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void wait_lruvec_unlock(struct lruvec *lruvec)
> +{
> + spin_unlock_wait(&lruvec_zone(lruvec)->lru_lock);
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
> +
> +/* Dynamic page to lruvec mapping */
> +
> +/* Lock other lruvec for other page in the same zone */
> +static inline struct lruvec *__relock_page_lruvec(struct lruvec *locked_lruvec,
> + struct page *page)
> +{
> + /* Currenyly only one lru_lock per-zone */
> + return page_lruvec(page);
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct lruvec *relock_page_lruvec_irq(struct lruvec *lruvec,
> + struct page *page)
> +{
> + struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
> +
> + if (!lruvec) {
> + spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> + } else if (zone != lruvec_zone(lruvec)) {
> + unlock_lruvec_irq(lruvec);
> + spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> + }
> + return page_lruvec(page);
> +}
Could you add comments/caution to the caller
- !PageLRU(page) case ?
- Can the caller assume page_lruvec(page) == lruvec ? If no, which lru_vec is locked ?
etc...
> +
> +static inline struct lruvec *relock_page_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec,
> + struct page *page,
> + unsigned long *flags)
> +{
> + struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
> +
> + if (!lruvec) {
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, *flags);
> + } else if (zone != lruvec_zone(lruvec)) {
> + unlock_lruvec(lruvec, flags);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, *flags);
> + }
> + return page_lruvec(page);
> +}
Same here.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists