[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1330438853.11248.90.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:20:53 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: lockdep: Warning & NULL ptr deref
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 16:19 +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 10:24 -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >>
> >> I'll send some patches to prevent the NULL deref itself which happens
> >> since a chunk of the code in lockdep.c assumed hlock_class() can't
> >> return NULL.
> >>
> > There's tons of code actually assuming that..
> >
> >> This won't fix the actual problem though, I'm not sure exactly how a
> >> held lock wouldn't have a class initialized to it.
> >
> > static inline struct lock_class *hlock_class(struct held_lock *hlock)
> > {
> > if (!hlock->class_idx) {
> > /*
> > * Someone passed in garbage, we give up.
> > */
> > DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(1);
> > return NULL;
> > }
> > return lock_classes + hlock->class_idx - 1;
> > }
> >
> > Typically that translates to severe memory corruption.
>
> I can also reproduce it easily by triggering sysrq once or twice after
> trinity has stopped.
What's trinity ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists