[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120228142731.GB15700@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:27:31 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uprobes/core: handle breakpoint and signal step
exception.
* Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > The current unregistering thread waits till all other
> > > threads that have hit a breakpoint to acquire the
> > > uprobes_treelock before the uprobe is removed from the
> > > rbtree.
> >
> > s/is removed/are removed
> >
> > ?
> >
>
> At a time, we are unregistering just one probe,(atleast for
> now.) Wondering if "before uprobes are remove from rbtree."
> sounds as if more than one uprobe is being removed at one
> instance.
The sentence still does not parse:
" X waits until Ys that have done Z before A is removed from
the rbtree"
Did you want to say:
" The current unregistering thread waits till all other
threads have hit a breakpoint, to acquire the
uprobes_treelock before the uprobe is removed from the
rbtree. "
(I have removed 'that' and added a comma.)
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists