[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxgf_HHZKhN9FwOBgKoJHbkFzdCrPhMwWbWKXhb9NpkPg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:34:49 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>,
Jongman Heo <jongman.heo@...sung.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] i387: split up <asm/i387.h> into exported and
internal interfaces
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> This is done by preempt notifiers. Whenever a task switch happens we
> push the guest fpu state into memory (if loaded) and let the normal
> stuff happen. So the if we had a task switch during instruction
> emulation, for example, then we'd get the "glacial and stupid path" to fire.
Oh christ.
This is exactly what the scheduler has ALWAYS ALREADY DONE FOR YOU.
That's what the i387 save-and-restore code is all about. What's the
advantage of just re-implementing it in non-obvious ways?
Stop doing it. You get *zero* advantages from just doing what the
scheduler natively does for you, and the scheduler does it *better*.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists