linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] acpi: Fix unprotected smp_processor_id() in acpi_processor_cst_has

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:57:53 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, lenb@...nel.org
Cc:	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>, deepthi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] acpi: Fix unprotected smp_processor_id() in acpi_processor_cst_has_changed()

On Tuesday, February 28, 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 03:19:43PM +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:58:05PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > The acpi_processor_cst_has_changed() function is invoked from a
> > > CPU_ONLINE or CPU_DEAD function, which might well execute on CPU 0
> > > even though the CPU being hotplugged is some other CPU.  In addition,
> > > acpi_processor_cst_has_changed() invokes smp_processor_id() without
> > > protection, resulting in splats when onlining CPUs.
> > > 
> > > This commit therefore changes the smp_processor_id() to pr->id, as is
> > > used elsewhere in the code, for example, in acpi_processor_add().
> > > 
> > > This works for me, but I don't claim to understand ACPI.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
> > 
> > Got the same warning.
> > And the patch works on my side.
> > 
> > Tested-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
> 
> Thank you, I have added your Tested-by (and Srivatsa's Reviewed-by,
> for that matter).
> 
> Any takers for this, or should I just push it up the -tip tree?

I think this patch is for Len, either through ACPI, or through the idle tree.
Len?

Anyway:

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>

Thanks,
Rafael


> > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> > > index 0e8e2de..9e57b06 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> > > @@ -1159,8 +1159,7 @@ int acpi_processor_cst_has_changed(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> > >  	 * to make the code that updates C-States be called once.
> > >  	 */
> > >  
> > > -	if (smp_processor_id() == 0 &&
> > > -			cpuidle_get_driver() == &acpi_idle_driver) {
> > > +	if (pr->id == 0 && cpuidle_get_driver() == &acpi_idle_driver) {
> > >  
> > >  		cpuidle_pause_and_lock();
> > >  		/* Protect against cpu-hotplug */
> > > 
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> > 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/