[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1330464100.11248.94.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:21:40 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD] cgroup: about multiple hierarchies
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 16:16 -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>
> But in this case, if task and groups are treated at same level, things
> are not static and % share will change dynamically.
which is exactly how the scheduler stuff behaves for the proportional
bits.. so there's no reason not to do it too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists