lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:43:54 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>, Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> Subject: Re: [RFD] cgroup: about multiple hierarchies On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 16:35 -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote: > For > cpu controller, it is priority at the group level no fixed minimum/maximum > % shares. And that's a limitation of treating task and group at same level. Depends on what you mean by min/max %, you can do it on the group level by using bandwidth caps (for max) or inverted (max on everybody else, for min). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists