[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120228011100.GA18378@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:11:00 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] vt:tackle kbd_table
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 04:10:23PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> This could do with some extra eyes and double checking. With this one out of
> the day we can start to make a dent in the console locking logic and thus
> eventually into tty_lock().
>
> From: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Keyboard struct lifetime is easy, but the locking is not and is completely
> ignored by the existing code. Tackle this one head on
>
> - Make the kbd_table private so we can run down all direct users
> - Hoick the relevant ioctl handlers into the keyboard layer
> - Lock them with the keyboard lock so they don't change mid keypress
> - Add helpers for things like console stop/start so we isolate the poking
> around properly
> - Tweak the braille console so it still builds
The drivers/staging/speakup/main.c code also would need to be tweaked in
this same manner, but that's not a big deal.
Other than that, at first glance, this looks good, nice job. Care to
make the speakup change and resend it so we can try it out in
linux-next?
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists