[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1330505894.11248.108.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:58:14 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpumask: fix lg_lock/br_lock.
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 09:29 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> As part of any cleanup they should first be converted from
> arch_spinlock_t to regular spinlock_t - I bet if that is done
> then that not only simplifies the wrappers massively, it also
> turns the above soft lockup report into a nice, actionable
> lockdep splat.
It might help if you'd actually read the code.. that will simply not
work.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists