linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 00/22] loop: Issue O

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 29 Feb 2012 04:08:03 -0500
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Zach Brown <zab@...bo.net>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/22] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio with pages

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:14:34AM -0500, Zach Brown wrote:
> Yeah, that's reasonable.  Perhaps obviously, we started with new entry
> points to minimize the amount of churn we'd have to go through to test
> the change in behaviour.
> 
> It's going to be messy to try and abstract away the pinning and dirtying
> of the iter regions from direct IO through the iter interface, but maybe
> not horribly so.

I don't really care to much about the implementation inside fs/direct-io.c
(at least for now - once I see it I might still scream "bloody
murder!").

The point is to pass the iov_iter all the way down to a common entry
point in fs/direct-io.c, so that the filesystems don't have to care
for that difference.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/