[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F4DF4C6.90609@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:49:58 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
CC: kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: notify host when guest paniced
On 02/29/2012 03:29 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 02/28/2012 07:23 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> > On 02/27/2012 05:01 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >> We can know the guest is paniced when the guest runs on xen.
> >> But we do not have such feature on kvm. This patch implemnts
> >> this feature, and the implementation is the same as xen:
> >> register panic notifier, and call hypercall when the guest
> >> is paniced.
> >
> > What's the motivation for this? "Xen does this" is insufficient.
>
> Another purpose is: management app(for example: libvirt) can do auto
> dump when the guest is crashed. If management app does not do auto
> dump, the guest's user can do dump by hand if he sees the guest is
> paniced.
>
> I am thinking about another status: dumping. This status tells
> the guest's user that the guest is paniced, and the OS's dump function
> is working.
>
> These two status can tell the guest's user whether the guest is pancied,
> and what should he do if the guest is paniced.
>
How about using a virtio-serial channel for this? You can transfer any
amount of information (including the dump itself).
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists