linux-kernel - Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCHv23 00/16] Contiguous Memory Allocator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4yk+Ca4RDP=sYaXvEKuJzYNhyZWQ7jfKnpR+zCm=3Dq6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:34:02 +0800
From:	Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
To:	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
Cc:	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jesse Barker <jesse.barker@...aro.org>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Rob Clark <rob.clark@...aro.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	DL-SHA-WorkGroupLinux <workgroup.linux@....com>
Subject: Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCHv23 00/16] Contiguous Memory Allocator

Michal,

2012/2/29 Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>:
> On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:35:42 +0100, Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> 2012/2/23 Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>:
>>
>>> This is (yet another) quick update of CMA patches. I've rebased them
>>> onto next-20120222 tree from
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git and
>>> fixed the bug pointed by Aaro Koskinen.
>>
>>
>> For the whole series:
>>
>> Tested-by: Barry Song <Baohua.Song@....com>
>>
>> and i also write a simple kernel helper to test the CMA:
>
>
> Would it make sense to make a patch out of it putting it to tools/cma (or
> similar)?

i can send a patch for this. i am just thinking, should it be placed
in tools/ as a test utility or Documents/ as an example to explain CMA
to users who want to use cma. i also think we should have a seperate
document to explain cma in details in documents/, and my helper
program can be placed there.

how do you think?
>
> --
> Best regards,                                         _     _
> .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of      o' \,=./ `o
> ..o | Computer Science,  Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz    (o o)
> ooo +----<email/xmpp: mpn@...gle.com>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--

thanks
barry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/