[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57C28D85C66F5C49B9E212CBFAFDAC1F23013A86@CH1PRD0802MB115.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:08:02 +0000
From: Chris Kelly <ckelly@...odevices.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
(staging tree related)
Hi Stephen,
Many thanks for your reply. This is exactly what I needed. I have submitted a patch to fix the problem and it builds OK with the compiler you suggested below.
Kind regards
Chris Kelly
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Rothwell [mailto:sfr@...b.auug.org.au]
Sent: 29 February 2012 7:52 AM
To: Chris Kelly
Cc: Greg KH; linux-next@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (staging tree related)
Hi Chris,
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:35:35 +0000 Chris Kelly <ckelly@...odevices.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> I believe I understand the cause of the problem and would like to
> submit a patch to fix it. However, I am unclear on what the starting
> point is given that the final patch was reverted from linux-next. Do I
> assume that patch will be reapplied before the applying the new patch
> or should I provide another patch to reapply the reverted patch? Is it
> acceptable to submit patches generated against the head of linux-next?
Your patches are all still in Greg's tree which I merge into linux-next every day. I have then been reverting that last patch each day. Your patch should be against Greg's tree (or your last patch) and then when the fix is in Greg's tree, I will get it in linux-next and stop reverting the other patch.
> Before submitting the patch, I would like to test that the patch
> really does fix the issue found by Stephen. Since it doesn't occur
> when building for x32 or x64 then I need to setup a PowerPC
> cross-compile tool chain. Do you have any suggestions as to where I
> can pull a prebuilt tool chain or do I need to build directly from the GNU sources.
http://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/4.6.0/x86_64-gcc-4.6.0-nolibc_powerpc64-linux.tar.xz
That is am x86_64 hosted powerpc64 compiler suitable for building the kernel.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists