[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F040162@ORSMSX104.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:20:35 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
CC: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
EDAC devel <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3] mce: Add a msg string to the MCE tracepoint
> IMHO, before removing those fields, it would be better to first implement
> what is there at the mcelog userspace parser for the Intel machines into
> kernelspace (or to look into its source code), and check what registers
> aren't used by either AMD 64 MCE decoder or by the Intel MCE decoder.
>
> Tony,
>
> Is there anyone at Intel working on porting it to kernelspace?
The mcelog code just looks at model specific fields in MCi_STATUS
and MCi_MISC. We could move it to the kernel - but I don't see
much value in doing so. In this case all the information we need
is carried in status/misc - so as long as we keep all of those
bits (and the cpu family/model) we can safely decode/analyze later.
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists