[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120229191258.GA28941@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:12:58 +0100
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>
Cc: Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>, keithp@...thp.com,
airlied@...ux.ie, chris@...is-wilson.co.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix single msg gmbus_xfers writes
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 07:22:00PM +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2012 6:48 PM, "Daniel Vetter" <daniel@...ll.ch> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 12:03:17PM -0800, Benson Leung wrote:
> > > gmbus_xfer with a single message (particularly a single message write) would
> > > set Bus Cycle Select to 100b, the Gen Stop cycle, instead of 101b,
> > > No Index, Stop cycle. This would not start single message i2c transactions.
> > >
> > > Also, gmbus_xfer done: will disable the interface without checking if
> > > it is idle. In the case of writes, there will be no wait on status or delay
> > > to ensure the write starts and completes before the interface is turned off.
> > >
> > > Fixed the former issue by using the same cycle selection as used in the
> > > I2C_M_RD for the write case.
> > > GMBUS_CYCLE_WAIT | (i + 1 == num ? GMBUS_CYCLE_STOP : 0)
> > > Fixed the latter by waiting on GMBUS_ACTIVE to deassert before disable.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>
Queued for -next (with a grumpy noted added to the commit message), thanks
for the patch.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@...ll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists