lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120229111322.9eb4b23ff1672e8853ad3b3b@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:13:22 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
	Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/6] x86, efi: Fix endian issues and unaligned
 accesses

Hi all,

On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:52:10 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:37:24 +0000 Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
> > 
> > We may need to convert the endianness of the data we read from/write
> > to 'buf', so let's use {get,put}_unaligned_le32() to do that. Failure
> > to do so can result in accessing invalid memory, leading to a
> > segfault.  Stephen Rothwell noticed this bug while cross-building an
> > x86_64 allmodconfig kernel on PowerPC.
> > 
> > We need to read from and write to 'buf' a byte at a time otherwise
> > it's possible we'll perform an unaligned access, which can lead to bus
> > errors when cross-building an x86 kernel on risc architectures.
> > 
> > Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
> > Cc: Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>
> > Tested-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> > Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> > Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
> 
> Just to be absolutely clear, I have not yet tested this version of the
> patch and also this fixes a problem with cross building Linus' tree (i.e.
> this is a regression with cross building introduced in v3.3-rc1).

OK, I tried just that patch on top of Linus' tree and obviously that
didn't work :-) so I pulled the x86/build branch from the tip tree into
my tree (which contained just Linus' tree of today
(v3.3-rc5-97-g891003a)). and the build failed like this:

arch/x86/boot/tools/build.c:36:22: error: asm/boot.h: No such file or directory

The build is an ARCH=x86_64 defconfig with CONFIG_EFI_STUB=y.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ