[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQXiCAxtNCafBtvx2Wj6=te5ciLjbC9icaPn788xQD06kQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:26:48 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/24] PCI, ia64: Register busn_res for root buses
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Why do you add a new struct resource here? Can't you just use the one
>>> passed in from acpi_pci_root_add()?
>>
>> not quite sure about the life cycle for that object.
>
> The struct acpi_pci_root is allocated in acpi_pci_root_add() and freed
> in acpi_pci_root_remove(), so it should be safe for PCI to use.
ok will change that for ia64.
>
> Same thing applies for x86, of course.
for x86, will have separate addon patch.
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists