linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] get_maintainer.pl: Add support for moderated lists

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120229160254.eda62e01.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:02:54 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Ian.Campbell@...rix.com,
	florian@...kler.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] get_maintainer.pl: Add support for moderated lists

On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:06:45 +0100
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:

> Am 29.02.2012 20:58, schrieb Joe Perches:
> > <shrug>  From my perspective, it's correct and simple.
> > 
> > Moderated lists just means your email may get delayed
> > and you may get a "delayed due to moderation" email.
> 
> Most moderated lists are "moderated" by nobody and the patch
> goes to /dev/null.

That's a big problem - we don't want people to send their fixes and bug
reports into black holes.

So yes, I think that teaching get_maintainer to emit black hole
warnings is a good idea.

Problem is, I don't think the string "moderated" explains the situation
very well for the uninitiated :(

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/