[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120301114023.GB32410@aftab>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 12:40:23 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
To: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
EDAC devel <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mce: Add a msg string to the MCE tracepoint
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 11:23:22AM +0900, Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
> (2012/02/29 22:37), Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:05:53AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >> Em 29-02-2012 09:19, Borislav Petkov escreveu:
> >> - on SB, the MCE status register only has the error message. In order to get
> >> the DIMM location, the driver needs to parse the registers that describe
> >> how the DIMM's are organized (this is spread on dozens of PCI devices, and
> >> 200+ registers), and how they're interlaced, in order to convert the error
> >> address reported by the MCA into a DIMM location.
> >
> > As I already said, amd64_edac does a similar thing does already so I
> > don't see any difference in the solutions there: decode to the DIMM and
> > pass the info through 'msg'.
>
> My concern is; on Sandy Bridge, is it safe to gather info about the DIMM
> location in/from machine check context in a reasonable time span?
Well, what amd64_edac does is "buffer" the required lookup info so
whenever you get an error, you simply lookup the channel and chip select
- all ops which can be done in atomic context.
[..]
> Getting back to the "msg" I think it is not necessary if it does not
> contain any new data which is not available in the mce_record today.
> If you just want to add field about physical memory location, I think
> string "msg" is not only way to do so.
No, currently, the mce_record contains the following, for example:
CPU: 0, MCGc/s: 0/0, MC4: d604c00006080a41, ADDR/MISC: 0000000000000016/dead57ac1ba0babe, RIP: 00:<0000000000000000>, TSC: 0, TIME: 0
With the decoded info added, it becomes:
[Hardware Error]: CPU:0 MC4_STATUS[Over|CE|-|PCC|AddrV|CECC]: 0xd604c00006080a41 MC4_ADDR: 0x0000000000000016
[Hardware Error]: Northbridge Error (node 0): DRAM ECC error detected on the NB.
[Hardware Error]: ERR_ADDR: 0x16 row: 0, channel: 0
[Hardware Error]: cache level: L1, mem/io: MEM, mem-tx: DWR, part-proc: RES (no timeout)
[Hardware Error]: CPU: 0, MCGc/s: 0/0, MC4: d604c00006080a41, ADDR/MISC: 0000000000000016/dead57ac1ba0babe, RIP: 00:<0000000000000000>, TSC: 0, TIME: 0)
where the ERR_ADDR line comes from amd64_edac looking up the error address.
This way, you get all the info needed to understand what the MCi_STATUS
of this MCE is telling you without any APM searching you'd normally have
to do to understand what each field means.
HTH.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists