[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1330604802.2465.43.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 04:26:42 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, rodrigo.moya@...labora.co.uk,
javier@...labora.co.uk, lennart@...ttering.net,
kay.sievers@...y.org, alban.crequy@...labora.co.uk,
bart.cerneels@...labora.co.uk, sjoerd.simons@...labora.co.uk,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10] af_unix: add multicast and filtering features to
AF_UNIX
Le jeudi 01 mars 2012 à 12:57 +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas a écrit :
> Yes, you are right it doesn't follow AF_UNIX semantics so Unix sockets
> is not the best place to add our multicast implementation.
>
Right, AF_UNIX is already a nightmare to maintain.
> So, now we are trying a different approach. To create a new address
> family AF_MCAST. That way we can have more control over the semantics of
> the socket interface for that family.
>
> We expect to have some patches in a few days and we will resend.
>
> Does this makes more sense to you?
>
Why adding an obscure set of IPC mechanism in network tree, and not
using (maybe extending) traditional IPC (Messages queues, semaphores,
Shared memory, pipes, futexes, ...).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists