[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1330564646.23314.23.camel@joe2Laptop>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:17:26 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Ian.Campbell@...rix.com,
florian@...kler.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] get_maintainer.pl: Add support for moderated lists
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 16:02 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:06:45 +0100
> Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
>
> > Am 29.02.2012 20:58, schrieb Joe Perches:
> > > <shrug> From my perspective, it's correct and simple.
> > >
> > > Moderated lists just means your email may get delayed
> > > and you may get a "delayed due to moderation" email.
> >
> > Most moderated lists are "moderated" by nobody and the patch
> > goes to /dev/null.
>
> That's a big problem - we don't want people to send their fixes and bug
> reports into black holes.
>
> So yes, I think that teaching get_maintainer to emit black hole
> warnings is a good idea.
>
> Problem is, I don't think the string "moderated" explains the situation
> very well for the uninitiated :(
It's also false. Most moderated lists in MAINTAINERS
(and I've probably send patches to most of them) are
in fact moderated.
My patches generally show up in their list archives.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists