[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1330624986.11248.209.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 19:03:06 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@...hat.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD] cgroup: about multiple hierarchies
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 18:19 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> Dne 23.2.2012 15:13, Peter Zijlstra napsal:
> > My utter disregard for cgroups comes from having to actually implement a
> > controller for them, its a frigging nightmare. The systemd retards
> > mandating all this nonsense for booting a machine is completely bonghit
> > inspired and hasn't made me feel any better about it.
>
> systemd requires only CONFIG_CGROUPS=y. It does not need any controllers.
And that makes it better how?
> The insults are entirely unnecessary.
I think not, booting a machine should depend on the smallest possible
subset of features. Doing anything else is completely bonkers.
Luckily it looks like the Debian guys made the right decision -- albeit
for the wrong reasons.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists