[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120301184248.GC32588@thunk.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 13:42:48 -0500
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Jacek Luczak <difrost.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
lczerner@...hat.com
Subject: Re: getdents - ext4 vs btrfs performance
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 03:43:41PM +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote:
>
> Yep, ext4 is close to my wife's closet.
>
Were all of the file systems freshly laid down, or was this an aged
ext4 file system?
Also you should beware that if you have a workload which is heavy
parallel I/O, with lots of random, read/write accesses to small files,
a benchmark using tar might not be representative of what you will see
in production --- different file systems have different strengths and
weaknesses --- and the fact that ext3/ext4's readdir() returns inodes
in a non-optimal order for stat(2) or unlink(2) or file copy in the
cold cache case may not matter as much as you think in a build server.
(i.e., the directories that do need to be searched will probably be
serviced out of the dentry cache, etc.)
Regards,
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists