[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120301185035.GA25359@mail.gnudd.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 19:50:35 +0100
From: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...dd.com>
To: linus.walleij@...aro.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, giancarlo.asnaghi@...com,
alan@...ux.intel.com, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] gpio: add STA2X11 GPIO block
>> + if (cfg == PINMUX_TYPE_FUNCTION) {
> (...)
>> + case PINMUX_TYPE_OUTPUT_LOW:
> (...)
>> + case PINMUX_TYPE_OUTPUT_HIGH:
> (...)
>> + case PINMUX_TYPE_INPUT:
> (...)
>> + case PINMUX_TYPE_INPUT_PULLUP:
> (...)
>> + case PINMUX_TYPE_INPUT_PULLDOWN:
>
> We have created the pin control subsystem to handle things like
> this. (Muxing and complex control.)
>
> Please create a driver in drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sta2x11.c that
> expose both a pinctrl and a GPIOlib interface. The GPIOlib
> interface can call into the pin control portions just fine.
I'm sorry, after digging in it for a while I'm really lost. This
pinctrl file should be there _instead_ of the gpio file or in addition
to it? I see tegra has both, but u300 has only one.
Also, this pinctrl depends on CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL at this point in time.
Is it wise the make the whole sta2x11 thing depend on experimental?
Thanks
/alessandro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists